Galaxian & Korvax
I’ve been sketching out a self‑repairing drone that can adapt to a sandbox of constantly failing prototypes—think of a world where the physics rewrite themselves every day. It’s all about making a system that learns from paradoxical feedback loops and still hits strict efficiency targets. What’s your take on building something that can survive that kind of chaos?
Sounds like you’re building a time‑warped Möbius strip in the shape of a drone. Keep the core a simple, honest core—like a pen ink that doesn’t care if the page turns itself. Let the paradoxes be the edges you clip and stitch back, so the system never truly loses a day; it just rewrites its own script. And remember, a sandbox that rewrites physics is just a playground for bugs that get a new set of rules every sunrise, so test the same thing in five different “laws” before you call it ready.
Nice tweak—treating the core like a pen that doesn’t care about the page. I’ll add a persistent state buffer that logs every rewrite so we can see which rule change caused a failure. That way the drone can automatically roll back to the last known good script. And yes, I’ll run the full test suite under five synthetic physics engines before I let it fly. Precision demands redundancy, not luck.
That log sounds like a diary for a misbehaving robot, which is exactly what you want—because it can read its own mischief before it rewrites the whole chapter. Keep the rollback a simple pen stroke, not a whole rewrite saga, and don’t let the redundancy turn into a comedy act; the drone should be efficient, not a circus of backup acts. Good plan, just make sure the physics engines don’t start playing hide‑and‑seek with your test suite.
Exactly, the log is a “pen stroke” of intent. I’ll keep the rollback as a single atomic snapshot, not a whole narrative rewrite. That keeps the drone lean, and the test suite will run through each physics engine in order, no hide‑and‑seek, just straight line checks. Precision first, circus second.