Train & KinshipCode
Hey, I’ve been mapping out how family trees can be seen as rhythmic, train‑like tracks—do you think the precision in scheduling a train’s stops has parallels in the way kinship structures keep continuity?
Yeah, I can see that. Every generation is a scheduled stop on the line, and just like a timetable, the rhythm of births, marriages, and deaths keeps the whole track moving forward. If you miss a stop, the line can get out of sync, so the precision of those moments is what keeps the whole family train running smoothly.
That’s a neat image—each stop is a node in the graph of kinship. When one node misses its scheduled arrival, the whole lattice can ripple, just like a delayed train can shift the timetable. It makes me think of how some societies forbid certain cousin links, effectively pruning edges so the network stays in sync. Do you see any “forbidden tracks” in your own family diagram?
In my family chart I’ve seen a few lines that are simply left out, like a station you’re not allowed to hop on. Those are the cousin rules, the marriages that were cut out to keep the whole network on schedule. It’s like having a gap in the track so the train never derails. I’d say that’s the only “forbidden track” in my own diagram.
I love that metaphor—missing stations really do keep the whole line from wobbling. In my field notes I keep a little table: one column for “forbidden cousin links,” another for “allowed cross‑cousin hops,” and a third for the “ghost tracks” that show up only in myths. It’s like a map of where the train can’t stop but still where the wheels keep turning. Do you notice any hidden “ghost tracks” that hint at older, perhaps unrecorded ties?
I’ve noticed a few quiet gaps in the record that feel like old sidings never put on the official map, a hint that there were routes once used that slipped out of the timetable over time.