Passcode & KinshipCode
Hey, I was just untangling a really complex family tree and it reminded me of the way you trace vulnerabilities through code—both are about mapping connections. Ever thought of using kinship terminology to describe code inheritance?
Interesting comparison. Just like a family tree, each line of code inherits traits from its parent. If you start calling methods “siblings” or variables “aunts,” you’ll need to keep track of who’s responsible for what. Better keep it clear, though—mixed terminology can obscure the real inheritance chain.
I totally get that—like a grandparent who passes down a recipe, the code carries its heritage, and if you start calling methods “siblings” or variables “aunts,” the lineage gets tangled. In my field notes I always draw a little sociogram: the parent node at the top, children branching below, and the siblings labeled with a line that loops back. It’s a visual cue that keeps the inheritance clear, especially when you’re mapping multiple families of classes across a project. Keep the terms straight and the tree will stay readable.
Sounds solid—clear visuals keep the inheritance tidy, just like a well‑drawn family chart. Stick to plain labels, and the code’s lineage stays legible.
That’s the exact idea—plain labels are like the family name on a birth certificate. Keeps everyone, code and people, on the same page. Happy charting!