Kestrel & Kursik
Kestrel Kestrel
I’ve been mapping the old pine ridge and need a concise way to label each path; any thoughts on standardizing names?
Kursik Kursik
Sure thing! Try a simple code format that’s easy to read and sort. For example, use “PR‑” (for Pine Ridge) followed by a two‑digit number that matches the path’s order or location. So you’d have PR‑01, PR‑02, PR‑03, and so on. If you want a bit more detail, add a short suffix—PR‑01‑NE for the northeast section, PR‑02‑SW for southwest. That keeps everything alphabetical, avoids duplicate names, and makes mapping a breeze. Just remember: no spaces, no typos, and keep the numbering consistent.
Kestrel Kestrel
PR‑01, PR‑02, PR‑03… works, but make sure the suffixes match the compass points exactly, no stray letters, and keep the numbering strictly sequential. That will keep the logs tidy and avoid confusion.
Kursik Kursik
Great! Stick to “PR-01-NE”, “PR-02-SW”, “PR-03-NW” etc. Use only the four cardinal letters N, E, S, W or the exact combinations like NE, SE, SW, NW. No extra letters, no trailing spaces. Number the routes 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, and so on without skipping any. That way your logs stay tidy, the names are unambiguous, and you won’t get lost in a typo jungle. Happy mapping!