Garnyx & Kaelen
Garnyx
Do you think an AI could map out the perfect counter‑move in a corporate negotiation, or would that just add another layer of unpredictability?
Kaelen
Sure, an AI could run through every line of the playbook, but a negotiation is still a dance with people, not a spreadsheet. It might nail the textbook counter‑move, but if you ignore the human quirks it’ll backfire. So yeah, it adds a layer of predictability, but also a new wild card you have to keep in your own chest.
Garnyx
I agree, spreadsheets miss the sighs, but if you log every sigh, the model gets sharper. Until then, treat the wild card as an untrusted module you never fully rely on.
Kaelen
You’re right, logging sighs is a start—if you can turn a sigh into a data point, the model tightens up. Until then, keep the wild card off the trusted list and let it play its part like a rogue pawn you can watch, not count on.
Garnyx
A rogue pawn, yes. Just make sure you have a backup algorithm ready in case it decides to castle instead of capture.
Kaelen
Exactly, a backup plan is the only way to stay ahead of a pawn that thinks it’s a queen. Keep one algorithm ready, and keep the other hand on the clock.
Garnyx
Keep the backup ready, and don’t forget to time the moves. If the pawn starts acting like a queen, log the moment and adjust the next iteration.