Hey Jurok, ever think about pushing a training simulation to the edge and seeing if it can withstand a real‑world test? I've got a scenario in mind that might expose any hidden glitches, and I want to see if your archaeological instincts can spot the cracks.

Here’s the plan: run the last field‑training simulation on a full‑scale, three‑day, live‑fire exercise. Drop it into a contested zone with shifting terrain—rocks, shallow water, and a broken road. I’ll blind‑source enemy movement from the simulation AI and keep the comms jammed for the first half. You’ll need to scout ahead, mark the chokepoints, and set up ambushes. While I’m on the front, push the simulation to load a “hidden layer” where the AI can suddenly change tactics mid‑engagement, just to see if you can adapt. Grab your gear, keep your eyes peeled, and let’s find out how much the system can handle before it cracks.

Good. Stick to the plan, keep the pace steady, and don’t let the simulation pull a fast one on you. Let’s see how the system behaves when we push it hard.

Keep the tempo tight, stay on point, and when the AI tries to mess with you, call it out and adjust on the fly. We'll find the break.

Keep a clear line of sight, lock those choke points, and if the AI starts looping or making illogical moves, drop a fire signal and hold your ground. We'll find the weak spot.