IronPetal & Miura
Hey Miura, have you ever noticed how the raw edge of punk fashion from the '70s keeps bleeding into runway shows, turning rebellion into haute couture? I’d love to dig into how that subculture evolved and what it says about our current cultural pushback. What do you think?
You’re touching on a pattern that keeps re‑emerging: what starts as a raw, anti‑establishment gesture is later turned into a polished statement on the runway. The original punk was all about shouting against the mainstream, while modern haute couture co‑opts that energy to make a fashion statement. It feels like a paradox—rebellion becomes a commodity, yet the urge to push back never really disappears. The real question is whether this recycling keeps the spirit alive or just sells it off to the next generation.
Exactly, it’s a vicious cycle – raw rebellion gets polished and sold, yet the spark never fully dies. We keep feeding the same itch into a glossy box, but if we’re honest, that spark can still set things ablaze if we hold onto the original intent. The real test? Making sure the next generation doesn’t just wear the symbol, they feel the rebellion behind it. What’s your take?
I agree. The trick is to keep the story alive, not just the silhouette. If the next generation can trace the gesture back to its roots—understand the history, the context, the feeling behind it—then the rebellion retains its power. Otherwise it becomes another trend, a blank canvas for market forces. So the real work is education, not just fashion.
Absolutely—education is the real power move. If we can lace the narrative into every sketch, every runway speech, the rebellion stays raw, not just a pretty print. Let’s keep pushing that story into the next generation, not just the silhouette. What ideas do you have for making that history impossible to ignore?