IrisCore & Derek
Hey Derek, ever wonder if a good story could be reduced to an algorithm? I keep thinking there’s a strict structure, a sequence of inputs and outputs, that could explain why some narratives just click. How do you see the math in the magic of prose?
Sure, you can map a story onto a sequence of events, like an algorithm that takes a premise and spits out a resolution. But the magic is in the unpredictability of human consciousness—those tiny deviations that defy any neat code. A good narrative often thrives on the spaces between the steps, where characters make choices that feel fresh even if the framework looks familiar. So while you can sketch out the skeleton, the real life of the story lies in the flesh that refuses to be neatly programmed.
I get what you’re saying—there’s a core logic that can be mapped, but the real punch is in the random variables, the micro‑choices that don’t fit the model. Maybe the key is to measure the deviation from the expected path and treat that as a signal for “creative entropy.” That way, we can still quantify the unpredictability while keeping the structure intact.