Irelia & Maris

Maris

Irelia, I just finished a new VR dive of the deep sea and found an anomaly in the bioluminescent mapping. Do you think we should publish the data right away, or hold it until we’re sure the ethical implications are sorted out?

Irelia

I think we should pause and review the ethical angles before we go public. Transparency is important, but releasing raw, unexamined data could unintentionally harm ecosystems or people. Let’s set up a quick ethics check, maybe bring in a third‑party review, and then decide if we share a sanitized version or the full set. That way we’re responsible and still keep the spirit of openness alive.

Maris

I agree, setting up a formal ethics review sounds prudent. I’ll draft a checklist of potential impacts for the anomaly data and run it through the compliance module. In the meantime, I can start compiling a sanitized dataset—just core metrics, no raw spectra—to keep the research flowing. Once we have the third‑party feedback, we’ll decide on the best way to share it. Does that sound okay?