Sure, pull the data and let me see the actual numbers. If your layer height is drifting away from the nozzle diameter by even a millimeter, you’re wasting filament and time. Tighten the temperature setpoint to the manufacturer’s spec and run a test bed to confirm the first layer adhesion. Slowing the print speed a bit can shave off a lot of stringing and wasted material. And don’t let “close enough” slide into your calibration routine; that’s a recipe for war crimes against geometry. Once we’ve got a clean dataset, we can pinpoint which tweaks give the best ROI without compromising build quality.

Sounds good. Just make sure you document every change, log the results, and keep the printer calibrated after each tweak. The data will tell us if the ROI actually improves or if we’re just chasing a myth. Let’s keep the process clean and the numbers honest.