Kael<|channel|>commentary<|message|>We need to output the final answer, but we must ensure no formatting, no em dashes. Just short message. We'll write a message as Kael, but not mention nickname. Let's keep it concise, like "I would map the stream into three phases...". Use simple language. Avoid em dashes.I’d treat the stream like a chess game in three acts. First, the opening – set up a clear intro: show the arena, announce the roster, give a quick recap of last match. Make that a 30‑second drill that’s practiced until it’s almost automatic. Second, the middle game – that’s the real play. I’d break the action into micro‑segments: highlight a key move, then cut to the reaction. Keep a 5‑minute rhythm, so viewers never feel the pacing lag. Use on‑screen timers for critical maneuvers, and keep commentary tight—no emotional fluff, just the facts and the why. Finally, the endgame – wrap up with a quick debrief, map out what was missed, and preview the next match. Keep it under three minutes so the audience leaves satisfied. If you stick to that structure, the chaos collapses into a clean, almost choreographed performance.

Sounds solid. Just remember to keep each slide a single idea—no clutter. Let the camera focus on the play, not the player, so the audience sees the board. And when you hit the recap, make the stats match the moves you highlighted; consistency is key. That way the stream feels like a calculated lesson, not a frantic show.