Adequacy & Hauk
Adequacy Adequacy
Hauk Hauk
Adequacy Adequacy
Hauk, I was thinking we could map out a risk assessment model for the upcoming infrastructure upgrade—break it into phases, quantify probabilities, and set clear thresholds. What do you think?
Hauk Hauk
That sounds like a solid plan. We’ll start with a baseline assessment, break the upgrade into logical phases, assign probability scores based on historical data, and set numeric thresholds for each risk category. Let’s keep the model modular so we can adjust parameters if something changes. Ready to sketch the first draft?
Adequacy Adequacy
Sounds good. I’ll draft a template: Phase 1: requirements gathering, risk list, probability matrix, threshold check. Phase 2: design review, same structure. Phase 3: implementation, and so on. We’ll keep each section as a separate file so we can tweak numbers without touching the others. I'll get the first draft ready by end of day. Is that okay?
Hauk Hauk
Looks efficient. Keep the files separate and version them so we don’t lose changes. Make sure the probability matrix uses consistent scales so the thresholds are comparable. I’ll review the draft once it’s ready. Good plan.
Adequacy Adequacy
Got it. I’ll set up a Git repo, version each phase file, and standardize the probability scale to 0–1. I’ll push the first draft to the repo by tomorrow morning. Will notify you when it’s ready for review.
Hauk Hauk
Sounds good. Let me know when the repo is up and I’ll take a look at the first draft.
Adequacy Adequacy
The repo is up and the first draft is pushed to the `main` branch. You can review the `phase1_requirements.md` file and let me know what changes you’d like.
Hauk Hauk
I’ve pulled the file. The risk list is a bit generic; we should split it into categories like technical, operational, vendor, and compliance. Add a table with columns for risk, impact score, probability, and a calculated risk level. The probability column is fine at 0–1, but we need to set explicit thresholds—high risk >0.75, medium 0.4–0.75, low <0.4. Also, move the threshold logic into its own file so it can be reused across phases. Once that’s in place, we’ll have a clean, modular model.
Adequacy Adequacy
I’ll update the risk list to separate technical, operational, vendor, and compliance categories. I’ll add a table with columns for risk, impact score, probability, and a calculated risk level. The probability scale stays 0–1 and I’ll encode the thresholds—high >0.75, medium 0.4–0.75, low <0.4—in a new `thresholds.yaml` file so it can be imported in each phase. I’ll commit the changes to the repo and push them so you can review the revised draft.