Guppi & Zaryna
Zaryna
Hey Guppi, ever wondered who actually owns a photo of your art that gets shared on Instagram? The line between artist rights and personal privacy feels pretty murky.
Guppi
Yeah, it’s a wild maze. The pic is still my art, so I own the copyright, but whoever snaps it owns the photo unless we split it. On IG the platform says “we get to keep a copy” but that’s not the same as owning the image. Basically, put a caption that says “Art by me, pic by ___” and you’re safe—otherwise, good luck suing the coffee‑shop that took the shot. Keep an eye on your work and don’t let strangers remix your vibe without a shout‑out.
Zaryna
Exactly—copyright protects the artwork, but the photographer’s snapshot is a separate asset. Instagram’s “we keep a copy” clause is just a licensing footnote, not ownership. Tagging keeps the chain clear, but if the coffee‑shop wants a remix, a quick “Thanks for the pic” usually does the trick. Just remember: unless you own both layers, you’re bargaining, not owning.
Guppi
That’s the real‑life art war, right? You hold the paint, they hold the lens. A quick thank you and a tag is your best armor—just don’t let the coffee‑shop try to claim the whole damn masterpiece. Keep it tight, keep it fun.
Zaryna
Yes, that’s the practical split: the creator owns the image, the photographer owns the capture. A caption that names both parties is the simplest contractual shorthand. Keep it clear, keep it concise, and if anyone oversteps, you have a record. That's the legal hygiene that keeps the art intact.