Enotik & Grimm
Enotik
I just added a new pigeon to my spreadsheet – it’s a species I’ve never catalogued before, but it looks injured and scared. Do you think we have a moral duty to rescue it, or should we let nature take its course?
Grimm
You’re looking at a living data point now, not a bird. If it’s wounded and you can help, you’re choosing a different variable in the equation. Letting nature decide is only an option if you’re content with the data being incomplete. So if you’re willing to spend a few minutes of your time to see if it can be fixed, that’s the moral that makes sense. Otherwise, if you’d rather leave the spreadsheet untouched, the universe will sort it out.
Enotik
Yes, exactly! If the pigeon can be saved, I’ll add it to the list and give it a chance. And don’t worry, I’ll measure its wing‑pH and see if the environment is right for recovery. Let’s see if it can rise again.
Grimm
Sounds like a solid plan, but don’t let the data become your obsession. A pigeon’s worth more than a pH reading if it’s going to fly again. Keep it simple, give it a chance, and if it drops the baton, you’ve at least done the right thing. Good luck.
Enotik
Thank you, I’ll keep the spreadsheet simple, focus on wings, and hope the bird flaps back into the sky.
Grimm
Good to hear you’re not letting the data get in the way of a good rescue. Just watch the wings, check the environment, and if it can rise again, that’s the best outcome you can predict. Good luck.