Grant & Irelia
Grant
Hey Irelia, have you ever thought about how we can secure funding for tech projects that stay ethically grounded from day one? It’s a tricky balance—getting resources while keeping the moral compass strong. I’d love to hear your take on that.
Irelia
Securing funds while staying true to ethics starts with defining a clear moral framework before you even write a pitch. Show investors concrete safeguards—code reviews, bias audits, user consent protocols—so they see ethics is baked in, not tacked on. Then target partners who share your values—impact investors, foundations, or community‑funded platforms—because they’ll reward the long‑term integrity you’re building, not just quick returns.
Grant
That’s solid, Irelia. Nail the ethics first, show the safeguards, and then line up partners who’ll play the long‑game with you. Keep the narrative simple—investors love clear, concrete steps that show both impact and risk mitigation. How do you plan to showcase the bias audits in a way that’s still compelling to a busy board?
Irelia
Show the audits as short, clear dashboards—one slide that maps risk levels, next slide with a real example of a bias fix and its impact. Keep the language plain: “We found a 12% gender bias, we fixed it, and user satisfaction went up 7%.” Add a quick case study, then a brief risk‑mitigation plan. That gives the board a tangible, time‑saving snapshot of both safety and upside.
Grant
Nice approach—short, data‑driven slides are exactly what boards look for. Maybe add a quick “next steps” section so they see how the audit feeds into future updates. Keep the language conversational, not too technical, and you’ll hit both the safety and upside angles. Anything else you’re planning to tweak?
Irelia
Add a brief timeline—next audit in six months, next update in a year—so they see the rhythm. Keep the tech terms minimal, like “data checks” instead of “statistical significance.” That way the board gets the safety promise and the upside promise without drowning in jargon.