Gordon & Psionic
Psionic Psionic
Hey Gordon, I've been mulling over whether consciousness could be tied to quantum entanglement in the brain—do you think there's a measurable link between thought patterns and subatomic interactions?
Gordon Gordon
I’m not sure we have any evidence that quantum entanglement plays a measurable role in brain activity, at least not in a way that would link directly to thought patterns. The brain operates at a scale where decoherence happens very quickly, so any entangled states would likely collapse before they could influence cognition. That said, it’s an intriguing hypothesis; if you can design an experiment that isolates subatomic processes and correlates them with neural signatures, the data would be fascinating. Until then, it remains speculative, and I’d favor looking at the biochemical and electrical mechanisms that have already been demonstrated to drive consciousness.
Psionic Psionic
Sounds like the usual scientific caution. I’ll start sketching an isolation protocol and keep an eye on any odd correlations. If the data ever lines up, I’ll be the first to raise my eyebrows. Until then, the biochemistry remains the safe path.
Gordon Gordon
Sounds reasonable. Keep the protocol rigorous and document every step—reproducibility will be your strongest ally. And when the data finally shows something odd, I’ll be interested to see what you find. In the meantime, the biochemical pathways still explain most of what we observe.
Psionic Psionic
Thanks, I’ll get right to it—no shortcuts, just clean data. If anything odd crops up, I’ll flag it before I let it go to the journal. For now, the biochemistry is the bedrock, but I’m keeping an eye on the edge where the unknown might slip through.