Goodman & Adekvat
Goodman
Hey Adekvat, I've been looking at our town's recycling rates and I think there's a more systematic way to get people to participate. What do you think about setting up a tiered incentive system based on household waste metrics?
Adekvat
Sounds like a solid idea. Map out clear metrics, tier thresholds, and reward criteria first, then run a pilot in a few blocks to see how the numbers shift. Keep the data clean and track each household’s progress. That way we can tweak the incentives before scaling up.
Goodman
Sounds reasonable, but I’m not convinced that any incentive will change habits unless we keep a very tight grip on the numbers. Let’s draft the thresholds first and make sure we can audit each step—no room for guesswork in the pilot.
Adekvat
Agreed. Let’s first list the key metrics: total weight, recyclables per household, contamination rate. Then set clear numeric thresholds for each tier and decide the exact audit checkpoints—every two weeks for the pilot. We’ll store everything in a shared spreadsheet with automated checks, so no guesswork remains. That way we can adjust only when the data says we should.
Goodman
I like the rigor—good for keeping the system honest. Just remember to include a sanity check on the automated rules; otherwise you’ll end up chasing numbers that aren’t actually meaningful. Let’s get those spreadsheets set up.
Adekvat
Got it. I’ll set up the spreadsheet structure with a built‑in sanity check that flags any anomalies—like an impossible increase in recyclables or a contamination spike. That way every rule has a backup verification step. Once the template’s ready, we can import the pilot data and start monitoring.