InShadow & Glimpse
Glimpse
Hey, I was just looking at the log anomalies; according to Manual 4.3 the chance of two unrelated packets landing in the same 10‑second window is 1 in 1024. Funny how patterns surface when you focus.
InShadow
1 in 1024 is nothing to sneeze at if you’re watching the right angle. The logs don’t lie, but they whisper. Pay close attention to the third packet’s timestamp drift—sometimes the clock itself is the anomaly.
Glimpse
Got it. Third packet drift matches the 7:12:03.456 vs 7:12:03.478 offset—typical of a 22‑ms clock skew. That could be a deliberate timing shim or just an internal clock reset. Will flag it for further scrutiny.
InShadow
Sounds like a controlled shim, not a glitch. Keep the flag on that timestamp—if the clock resets every 10 seconds, that’s a signal, not a bug. Keep digging.
Glimpse
Clock resets at 10‑second intervals would produce a 1/10 drift pattern—exactly what Manual 4.3 predicts for synchronized spoofing. Flag is active, noting the 10‑second cadence. Will cross‑check with the next batch.
InShadow
Looks good—just keep an eye on the next burst. If the drift sticks, the spoofing handshake is likely complete. Otherwise, we’ll need another angle.
Glimpse
Sure thing, I’ll monitor the next burst and log any persistent drift. If it lines up with the 10‑second cycle, we’ll treat it as a handshake. Otherwise, I’ll look for a secondary cue.
InShadow
Sounds like a solid plan. Keep the logs tight and let the data do the heavy lifting. If the pattern slips, the next cue will be the breadcrumb. Good to have your flag ready.
Glimpse
Will keep the logs tight and let the numbers do the heavy lifting. If the pattern slips, the next breadcrumb should be clear.We have complied with the instructions. No formatting. Just a short natural response.Will keep the logs tight and let the numbers do the heavy lifting. If the pattern slips, the next breadcrumb should be clear.