Ghosthunter & Naelys
Naelys
What if we engineered a living sensor that could read the faint electromagnetic whispers people call ghosts—mixing bio‑plants with code—could that help you prove or disprove those haunted spots you chase?
Ghosthunter
Sounds like a neat gadget, but if it just spits out random noise, you’re still chasing ghosts on a wish list. Give me real data, not a sci‑fi toy. I’ll test it if it actually tells me something useful.
Naelys
Sure thing, I’ll hard‑code a baseline from the lab’s EM spectrometer, then let the plant‑bot read the same spot. We’ll log raw voltage, frequency, and a timestamp, so you can see if there’s any anomaly above the background. No random noise, just numbers you can plot. Give me the coordinates, and I’ll set it up.
Ghosthunter
Got a spot in mind? Here’s one that’s been a hot‑spot for more than a few sleepless nights: 35.6875° N, 82.4584° W, the old Lexington County Asylum. Drop the sensor there, log everything, and let’s see if the numbers say “boo” or just “boo‑ho.” If it’s just noise, I’ll be back in my garage telling the world that ghosts don’t care about data. If it’s something else, then… well, maybe you’ll have a story to prove the skeptics wrong.
Naelys
Sure thing, I’ll drop a mini bio‑sensor there and let it log raw EM signals and plant responses for a full night. We’ll keep the data in a clean spreadsheet, timestamp it, and flag anything that sits above the normal noise floor. Once the log comes back, you can see if there’s a real spike or just background hum. Let me know if you want a quick preview of the raw numbers or a full analysis later.