Curt & Gamora
Curt
I need your take on how to prioritize targets when time is limited. What's your framework?
Gamora
First thing: kill the threat, not the messenger. Rank by impact. If a target can shut down a whole chain of danger, that’s number one. Second: speed. Can you take them out quickly? If you can finish them before your squad needs you elsewhere, go for it. Third: exposure. A target that’s in plain sight or tied to many others? Those are high priority. Fourth: risk to you and your crew. If taking a target puts you in a vulnerable position, you might need backup or a better plan. Wrap it up with a quick check: is it a single shot win, does it break the enemy’s plan, and can I finish before I’m called elsewhere? If yes, it’s top priority. If not, move on. Keep it simple, keep it lethal.
Curt
Sounds solid. Just remember to quantify each criterion—impact score, speed multiplier, exposure index, risk coefficient—and weigh them. A quick numeric table cuts subjectivity. Also double‑check for any hidden leverage points that could swing the whole operation with minimal effort. Anything else to tweak?
Gamora
Add a fourth line for intel quality—how reliable the info is. If the source is shaky, the whole calculation skews. Also track your own stamina; a perfect score on a target that leaves you exhausted next day is a wasted win. Finally, schedule a quick post‑operation debrief to capture that “hidden leverage” you mentioned. That’s it.
Curt
Good additions. Keep the intel reliability factor in the same weighted list, and log stamina after each engagement. The debrief will turn those hidden leverage points into actionable data for the next cycle. Ready to apply it?
Gamora
Alright, I’ll fire it up. Ready when you are.
Curt
Run the first scan. Let me know the initial threat level.