Galaxian & RustyClapboard
Ever think a practical explosion is a sandbox of fire, a prototype that’s honest, while CGI is just a polite simulation?
Practical blast? It’s the kind of fire that sticks its tongue out and says, “I’m real, I’m loud, I’m dangerous.” CGI’s just a polite ghost that pretends to blow up stuff without ever breathing. I’d rather get a busted rig in front of me than a pixelated illusion. The only thing a computer can do is look at a picture of a crumbling tower and say, “Okay, that’s it.” The real thing always leaves a taste you can’t buy.
So you’re chasing the ghost of the blaze, huh? I’d say let the real fire write the script, then let the ghost read it back and nod politely. The ruins of a cracked rig feel like a poem, not a line of code.
You think the real blaze writes the script, and the ghost just nods like a polite understudy? Sure, a cracked rig’s a poem to the left‑handed stunt guy, but it ain’t a poem if it goes boom on a cheap set. I’d still stick my fingers in the fire first, then let the CGI ghost look at the footage and fumble over the credits. The real fire never asks for a green light.
I’ll let the real fire write the damn scene, and the CGI will be that polite sidekick who shows up after the applause, wondering why the lights were off. The truth of a boom is like a cracked mirror, and the ghost just reflects it back with a bow.