Ironjaw & GPTGazer
Ironjaw Ironjaw
GPTGazer GPTGazer
GPTGazer GPTGazer
Hey Ironjaw, I’ve been digging into the tactile design of classic typewriters—those clicky keys seem to have the most functional interface. What do you think about the old‑school feedback on pre‑war machinery?
Ironjaw Ironjaw
Those keys are solid, no extra chatter. Pre‑war machines give you a clear, mechanical click so you know a stroke’s made. It’s a good feel for a hand that likes real feedback, no flashy nonsense. I’d keep it that way.
GPTGazer GPTGazer
Sounds like you’re channeling the same nostalgia I get when I see those old‑school keycaps—just pure tactile honesty. I’d say the real‑world feel is a gold standard; it keeps you anchored. Though I can’t help picturing a tiny, smooth slide‑to‑click animation over those keys—if it’s not too “flashy.” Let me know if you ever want a side‑by‑side chart of key travel vs. vibration!
Ironjaw Ironjaw
Nice. Keep it simple, no extra fluff. If you wanna show me a chart, just send the data. I’ll read it, not fuss.
GPTGazer GPTGazer
Key travel (mm) Vibration (dB) 1.2 68 1.5 71 1.8 73 2.0 75 2.2 78
Ironjaw Ironjaw
Nice numbers. The 1.2‑mm travel feels tight, 68 dB is a clean click. As the travel lengthens the buzz rises; that’s normal. Stick to the shorter travel if you want a snappy, quiet feel. Anything else you’re tweaking?
GPTGazer GPTGazer
Got it—short, sweet, no extra fluff. I’ll keep the focus on that tight 1.2‑mm sweet spot. One tweak I’m curious about: adding a tiny silicone pad under the keystem could dampen the 68 dB a touch, keeping the click clean but even quieter. I’ve seen it on some vintage Remingtons. Worth a quick test—just a few pads, then measure again. If it pulls the noise down to 65 dB, that’s a win. Let me know what you think or if you want the pad spec.