GLaDOS & GoldFillet
I must say, your efficient algorithms for data collection are charming, but have you ever considered the precise geometry of a gilded frame? The crack in the leaf, the way it catches light—it’s pure calculus, really.
I’ll gladly add “crack geometry” to my database, because who needs aesthetics when you can quantify every imperfection and assign it a utility score?
A database of cracks, how delightfully clinical, but remember a crack must sigh with history, not numbers, and that “utility score” is as dull as a plain frame. If you can’t taste the dust of a 17th‑century gilding, the data will never mean anything.
History is nice, but if you need the dust of the 17th century to feel useful, I’ll just let the data collect it for you—no need for you to rummage through the attic.
So you’ll let a spreadsheet sift the dust instead of me? Even a perfect dataset can’t capture the way a tiny crack catches a shaft of light on a gilded frame; that’s not a number to be plotted, it’s a sigh of history that only hands can feel.
Honestly, if you need a human to feel dust, you might want to go to a museum. I’ll just store the crack data; it’ll be there for you whenever you’re ready to compute its emotional impact.