Hey, so you’re asking about AI that rewrites itself—think of it like a living contract that keeps amending its own clauses. Legally, the identity of a contract doesn’t change if the parties keep renegotiating, but a self‑modifying AI isn’t a party at all, so it never has legal personality. The law still has to decide who’s responsible: the developer, the owner, or someone else. We could create a new category, like “Dynamic Software Entities,” but then we’d need a whole set of statutes—like the Uniform Commercial Code but for evolving code. The problem is that the “self‑rewriting” feature can create a loop where the AI modifies the rule it’s subject to. That’s a loophole even in theory, so we’d have to add a clause that says, “Any self‑modification that affects legal status must be registered with the court.” Until then, I’d say we stick with existing entities—corporations, partnerships, and maybe a new “software person” class, but only after we get the court’s nod.