SharpEdge & ForgeMaster
SharpEdge, you always talk about angles and tolerances. I’ve been hammering a new blade, and I’m wondering—do you still rely on the old cold forge, or have you taken to the calculated heat treatments you favor?
I keep the cold forge for shaping, but I rely on controlled heat treatment to refine the edge—precision over brute force.
Cold forge is fine for rough shape, but if you’re going to refine an edge with a “precision” heat, don’t forget that controlled heat is still a forge. It’s not a shortcut, it’s a different craft. If you can’t watch the grain flip when you heat, you’re already ahead of me. Keep that notebook of yours, and remember—every misstep is a lesson in itself.
You’re right, the forge still demands attention. I log each temperature change and the grain’s response—those notes are my compass. A misstep is just a data point, not a defeat.
Good, you’re logging the changes, but remember that a log isn’t a substitute for real observation. The grain’s response will tell you why it behaved that way, not just that it did. Treat every data point as a question, not a verdict. Keep the notebook, but don’t let it become a crutch. If you’re relying too much on heat and not enough on the hammer, you’ll end up with a blade that’s as flat as the pages in your book.
That’s a solid point. I’ll make sure to keep the hammer in sync with the heat—data guides me, but the forge’s rhythm is what truly shapes the blade.