Symmetry gives you a balanced starting position, so neither side has a material or spatial edge. That can make the game too drawish, especially if you keep opening lines that mirror each other. You’ll also find fewer chances for tactical surprises, which can limit creative play. On the upside, the board is easier to analyze, and you can focus on pure positional development without worrying about asymmetrical pawn structures.

I like the idea of a subtle break in the symmetry. A slight shift on the edges will force you to evaluate every line rather than just relying on mirrored tactics. Just be careful that the variation doesn’t create an imbalance that gives one side an accidental edge. Keep the changes minimal and test each new line for positional soundness before settling on the final layout.

A single corner shift can open up a new line, but it also risks creating an imbalance in pawn structure that might give one side a long‑term edge. Make sure you test every variation, especially the ones that break the mirror, to confirm that the overall harmony stays intact. Once you’ve ruled out any hidden advantages, the board will be ready for serious play.