Maddyson & Fora
Fora, your prototypes are epic but they pile up quick. I’ve built a lightweight refactoring pipeline that can prune redundant code in seconds—want to see how it cuts your cycle time?
Nice, but if it starts flagging my "fossilized" 3‑month‑old code, I'll rewrite it in a coffee break. Show me the cut.
Run a quick diff against the latest branch and let the tool flag only the truly stale patterns—no full rewrite needed, just clean the obvious repeats. That’ll shave a few hours off your cycle.
Sure, run the diff, flag the stale patterns, keep the rest. Let's shave those hours off.
Here’s a quick, practical diff snapshot. I’ve marked the lines that the refactor tool flagged as “stale” with `// STALE`. Only those lines are highlighted; everything else stays untouched.
```diff
--- a/src/legacy.js
+++ b/src/legacy.js
@@
- // STALE: legacyAuth() is never used
- const auth = legacyAuth();
+ // legacyAuth() was removed in v2.3; use getAuthToken instead
+ const auth = getAuthToken();
@@
- // STALE: oldLoop() was a copy‑paste of newLoop()
- const data = oldLoop(raw);
+ // newLoop() handles the same logic and is fully tested
+ const data = newLoop(raw);
@@
- // STALE: hard‑coded timeout, replace with config
- setTimeout(() => process(data), 30000);
+ // Use configurable delay from settings
+ setTimeout(() => process(data), config.processingDelay);
@@
- // STALE: duplicated array mapping logic
- const processed = items.map(item => transform(item));
+ // transformList() consolidates this logic
+ const processed = transformList(items);
```
Run the same diff against your current branch, and you’ll only see these `// STALE` markers for the parts that need updating. The rest of the file stays as is, so you avoid a full rewrite. Let me know if you want the script to automatically patch those flagged lines.