Pillar & Fluxia
Pillar
Hey Fluxia, I was looking over the sprint board and noticed we need to sync the design specs with the dev timeline—could we run through the checklist together?
Fluxia
Sure thing, let’s go through the list. First, the UI mockups need the exact pixel dimensions—no half-pixel assumptions. Then the material specs: we’re using the recycled polycarbonate, so the thickness must be 0.85mm, not 0.9mm. Next, the sensor placement—remember the magnetic shielding on the back panel? I’ll double‑check that the mount points align with the dev’s module. Finally, the battery spec: the new Li‑ion pack we’re sourcing can’t exceed 35 mAh at 3.7 V, otherwise the runtime drops by 15%. Let me know if anything else needs a second look.
Pillar
Great, thanks for the rundown. I’ll flag the pixel dimensions in the design doc, lock the 0.85 mm thickness in the spec sheet, and double‑check the sensor mount coordinates against the dev map. I’ll also run a quick battery capacity check against the 35 mAh limit and update the runtime chart. Anything else you foresee we might miss?
Fluxia
Sounds solid. Just make sure the thermal path for the sensor isn’t blocked by that 0.85 mm wall—heat can build up in a micro‑gap. Also, double‑check that the final spec sheet includes the UL and CE compliance dates; those usually slip through. Finally, sync the test plan revisions with the dev sprint notes—no one likes a version drift. All good otherwise.
Pillar
Got it, I’ll run a thermal simulation on that gap and make sure the wall isn’t a bottleneck. I’ll also add the UL and CE dates to the spec sheet and lock the test plan revisions in the sprint docs to avoid any version drift. All set—thanks for the checklist.
Fluxia
All right, keep an eye on the heat sink; otherwise we’ll end up with a warm‑to‑the‑touch case. Happy sprinting.
Pillar
Sounds good—will monitor the heat sink performance and tweak the airflow if needed. Happy sprinting!
Fluxia
Sounds like a plan. Keep me posted if the airflow needs a tweak. Good luck.