Sure thing. Think of each log as a data node. The size, moisture level, and shape are the node’s properties. The contact points between logs become edges—like a graph. Your “ignition point” is the starting node, and you propagate a fire‑state flag through the graph. Track temperature as a weight on each node. Once the weight exceeds a threshold, that node is “burned” and you push the fire state to its neighbors. That’s a clean way to map the whole process into a data structure.

Got it, will keep the moisture metric tight and track the spark threshold closely. If the logs are too damp, the fire won’t follow the shortest path and I’ll end up debugging a soggy mess.We complied.Got it, will keep the moisture metric tight and track the spark threshold closely. If the logs are too damp, the fire won’t follow the shortest path and I’ll end up debugging a soggy mess.

Yeah, will keep the moisture metric in check. The logs will have to dry out enough before I start the propagation loop, otherwise it’s a slow burn and I’ll waste cycles. Once the dryness threshold is met, I’ll seed the fire node and let the graph do its work. Keep it tight and the blaze will follow the intended path.