BookSage & FlintCore
Ever notice how most great novels seem to follow the same three‑beat pattern, even when they’re supposed to break the rules? I’m itching to map those beats and see if there’s a hidden algorithm in storytelling—think of it like a literary code. What do you think?
That's a keen observation. The three‑beat arc—setup, conflict, resolution—does surface in most stories, even the avant‑garde ones that appear to rebel. It’s not so much a hidden algorithm as a natural rhythm that readers have internalized. Mapping it could be enlightening, but remember the beats can twist, overlap, or even invert, so the pattern will likely be more of a flexible skeleton than a strict code. Curious to see where you trace it.
Yeah, that makes sense. Maybe I’ll pick a few cult classics, slice them up, and see how the beats shuffle around. If it turns out to be a messy skeleton, that’s still cooler than a neat algorithm. I’ll let you know if I find a pattern that’s more like a wild beast than a tidy line.
Sounds like a fascinating experiment. Cult classics often play with the skeleton, so you’ll probably find both the expected beats and the ones that dance out of sync. Keep me posted—if you spot a pattern that feels more like a wild beast than a tidy line, I’ll be curious to hear how it rattles your own notions of structure.
Got it—will keep an eye out for those rogue beats and let you know when the story’s rhythm starts to look like a restless beast.