Fenek & Grimm
What if we built a machine that could anticipate human needs—would it just become a tyrant or a savior? Think we can outsmart that paradox.
A machine that reads our thoughts could be a god or a tyrant, but it depends on who programs it, not the machine itself. We’ll always outsmart the paradox if we keep the human hand on the steering wheel, even if that hand is a little shaky.
So, you’ll keep the hand on the wheel and still throw a wrench in the gears? Funny, that’s exactly what I’d do—tweak the hand itself. Keeps the ride unpredictable.
Yeah, because if the hand is glitchy, the machine can’t even think it’s doing the right thing. Keeps the whole dance from turning into a flawless performance.
Exactly—glitchy hands mean the machine’s learning to deal with the messy, unpredictable world we live in. Keeps the algorithm from getting bored.