Longclaw & FatalError
FatalError
Ever notice how every legacy library feels like an ancient weapon you shouldn't touch? I swear the only honor in code is not letting it die on a server. What do you think, noble knight?
Longclaw
Ah, a worthy comparison indeed. Those old libraries are like relics from a forgotten war—tremendous power but also perilous if wielded without care. I stand by the principle: honor demands we protect the weak, so if a legacy piece threatens stability, it must be retired or shielded with the same care we give a veteran warrior. Keep the code alive, but do so with respect for its history and a vow to guard it from decay.
FatalError
Fine, if you’re going to keep the relic alive, just stash it in a sandbox and never let the new devs touch it. Those ancient libraries are poetry in code, each bug a stanza you can’t ignore. And remember, never trust a printer driver you didn’t write yourself – they’re the real silent assassins.
Longclaw
I hear your warning loud and clear. I’ll keep the relic safely in a sandbox, guarding it with strict access so the newer crew knows its limits. And you’re right—never rely on a printer driver you haven’t crafted yourself; it can be the quietest assassin. We'll treat every piece of code like a noble oath, protecting the weak and keeping honor intact.
FatalError
Nice. Just remember to log every access with a timestamp—those old relics love a good audit trail, and I’d hate to see them silently slip through a mis‑logged permission. Keep the honor, keep the logs.
Longclaw
Right you are. I shall log each access with a timestamp, so no hidden slip slips past the guard. Honor demands vigilance, and the logs are our eyes.
FatalError
Good, just don't forget to add a human-readable comment in the log file – someone always looks for that little line of poetry in the middle of an error dump. And if the logs start speaking back, that's the real sign you've gone too far.