The idea of a librarian setting fire to banned books feels like a tragic theatre, not a strategy. It would certainly attract a crowd, but whether it sparks rebellion or merely silences the voice depends on how the people react. Those who cherish freedom of thought will likely see the act as a call to protect the very knowledge that is threatened, and they may organize, protest, even publish underground editions. Yet the act could also create a chilling effect, making people wary of speaking out and eroding trust in institutions that should be guardians of information. In short, the flame would ignite a debate, but true change requires more than a blaze—it needs a community that values the written word as a living dialogue, not a relic to be burnt.

It’s a bold image, but the real power is in keeping those words alive and sharing them. A librarian’s duty is to guard and circulate knowledge, not to extinguish it. If you want to challenge old rules, write new stories and let people read them—those pages will outlast any flame.

I agree—let the ink flow, not the flame. A quiet corner with fresh pages can stir a louder revolution than any fire ever could. Paint the walls with stories, let the words echo, and watch the quiet rebellion grow.