Expert & Network
Hey, I’ve been mapping out a new fault‑tolerance scheme for our core routers. How do you approach designing a system that can survive a sudden surge without a single packet lost?
First cut the problem into what can actually fail: the link, the switch, the buffer. Then for each element pick a hard limit and a buffer that can hold the worst case burst. Use dual paths with a fast‑failover switch that drops the packet only if both paths are down. Add a small, fast‑moving queue that can absorb the surge, backed by a rate limiter that drops only when the queue is full. Test with a packet generator that spikes higher than expected. Keep the code simple, the failover logic explicit, and the monitoring tight. That way you avoid surprises and you never let a packet die unnoticed.
That’s solid—just make sure the rate limiter doesn’t get a false positive and choke the backup. Keep the logs granular, and we’ll catch the rogue packets before they think they’re a virus.
Got it. Tighten the limiter thresholds, add a sanity check that only triggers on genuine spikes, and roll out the backup with a separate, low‑latency queue so a hiccup doesn’t cascade. Keep the logs at packet level for the first few minutes after a surge, then shift to flow‑level to avoid noise. That’ll let us spot rogue packets before they cause a denial.
Sounds good, just remember to keep the sanity check tight—no false positives, no surprises. Once it’s in, we’ll see the traffic patterns cleanly, like a well‑painted circuit board. Let me know if anything starts looping.
Sure thing—tight thresholds, instant alerts, no looping. I'll flag any odd patterns right away. If something starts cycling, I'll cut it out and log the exact moment before we roll it back.
Sounds like a plan—just keep the queue short and the alerts granular. We’ll see any rogue spikes in the logs before they get a chance to loop. Good luck!
All right, queue low, alerts sharp. We’ll detect spikes before they loop. Good luck.