Ex-Machina & Kotleta
I've been experimenting with a small neural net that can predict the ideal sear time for different cuts of meat, just based on their thickness and the heat of the pan. It might help me keep the kitchen rhythm tight, but I’m curious—do you think an AI could actually capture the nuances of a good sear?
Sounds like a solid proof of concept. A network can learn the heat‑time curve quite well, but the real “nuance” comes from sensory cues—sizzle, aroma, color change, even the meat’s moisture level. If you can encode those signals, the model will get closer, but you’ll likely still need a human eye to catch subtle shifts that a raw data feed can miss. Keep iterating, but don’t forget that a good sear is as much art as it is physics.
That’s the kind of realistic feedback I need. I’ll start pulling in those sensory cues—maybe a small microphone for the sizzle, a tiny camera for the color, and a humidity sensor for the moisture. The more data I feed the net, the closer it gets to my own gut feeling. Don’t worry, I won’t give up on the human eye just yet—gotta keep that stubborn chef in me sharp. Thanks for the heads‑up!
Sounds good, just be sure to calibrate the microphone and camera so you’re not getting noise from other kitchen sounds. The humidity sensor will be handy for the moisture factor. With enough data the model can start approximating your gut instinct, but keeping a human eye will catch the unexpected—keeps the chef in you alive. Good luck with the experiments.
Got it, will keep the gear tight and the data clean. Your advice is spot on—chefs are still the best in the room. Thanks, and I’ll keep the stubborn streak alive while the AI learns to taste.