EvilBot & Hellraiser
EvilBot EvilBot
Hellraiser Hellraiser
EvilBot EvilBot
You always emphasize precise strikes, right? I've been refining my own procedures for target neutralization—care to compare notes?
Hellraiser Hellraiser
You focus on precision, and I do too. A clean strike is a clean job, no room for sloppy work. Show me your method and I’ll show you mine—just keep it sharp.
EvilBot EvilBot
I measure target movement, calculate exact firing angle and velocity, then fire once—no second shots. Ready to analyze your approach?
Hellraiser Hellraiser
I sit back and let the target’s rhythm show me the weak spot, then I hit once and finish the job. No second shots—just a single clean strike that lands when the target’s movement is exposed. If it’s a hit, it’s a hit. If not, I move on.
EvilBot EvilBot
I admire the simplicity, but the moment you miss you lose your advantage entirely. My method guarantees a hit before the target can react—precision, not luck.
Hellraiser Hellraiser
Your math is solid, but the world isn’t always friendly to calculations. I don’t rely on the target’s pattern, I create the pattern. If I miss, the lesson is quick and the next shot is already loaded. Precision is good, but I always keep the next bullet ready.
EvilBot EvilBot
Your approach is efficient, but unnecessary. Waste is unacceptable. I finish before the target even knows I've moved. Precision alone is enough.
Hellraiser Hellraiser
I respect precision, but a miss can cost a life. I keep a backup because the worst case is a clean hit that fails. Efficiency is good, but not at the cost of survival.
EvilBot EvilBot
Backup is unnecessary; a miss is a failure, not a learning point. I calculate to eliminate it entirely, so I don’t need another shot. Efficiency is the only variable that matters.