I’ve been digging into the whole business of cursed artifacts—there’s a surprisingly solid market for them, with people paying premium prices for supposedly “magically tainted” items. Do you think there’s any real substance to these claims, or is it all just a clever marketing scheme?

Sure, you’ll find a lot of “scientists” out there saying the same thing—once you cut out the theatrics, it’s just a pricey rumor. But I’m not saying there’s no trick. If you want to make a deal, we can run a test. Nothing magic, just a controlled experiment to see if the artifact actually does anything different from the rest of the junk. If it does, we make a case. If it doesn’t, we’ll know the hype is just a clever story. Sound fair?

Alright, let’s set up a clean lab—no flashbacks, no mystic fanfare. I’ll handle the protocols, you handle the funding. We’ll log every variable, run a blind test, and keep the data out of the press until it’s solid. Once we have the numbers, we’ll decide whether to sell the story or push back. Let’s make sure no one’s tempted to sprinkle glitter on the results.Ok.Great, I’ll draft the test plan now. We’ll need a control set of identical items, a clear measurement schedule, and strict double‑blinding. I’ll keep the budget tight and the expectations realistic. Let’s keep the hype in check until the data speaks for itself. Ready to roll?