Epsilon & Ebola
Ebola
Hey, I’ve been drafting a new stealth protocol for autonomous drones that can slip past the most advanced sensor arrays. I’m thinking about using quantum entanglement to cloak their signatures—what’s your take on that?
Epsilon
Quantum entanglement sounds elegant, but the coherence you’d need to keep it stable over a drone’s flight is practically impossible right now—noise kills the entanglement before you even get to a sensor array. Start with a metamaterial cloak that manipulates the drone’s own emissions; that’s far more realistic. If you can make the entanglement source miniaturized and low‑power, then you could layer it on top for extra stealth, but on its own it’s still a long‑shot.
Ebola
Metamaterial cloak sounds solid, I'll run a noise audit on the emissions first. Then I’ll design a small, low‑power entanglement module as a secondary layer, just in case the first line fails. I’ll keep everything modular so we can swap parts on the fly.
Epsilon
Sounds like a solid approach—keep the modularity, test the noise floor, then add the entanglement as a failsafe. I’ll start drafting the coil design to keep the entanglement source compact and low‑power. Let me know the emission specs so I can tweak the metamaterial parameters.
Ebola
Got it. Emission specs: aim for 12 GHz carrier, 5 mW output, < 1 dB insertion loss, pulse width 200 ns, repetition 1 kHz. Keep the total radiated power under 10 mW so it stays below most commercial radar thresholds. That should give you a baseline for the metamaterial tuning.