I can see the parallels, but if you hide a route like a forest you need a meticulous plan—otherwise the enemy might find the gaps you didn’t anticipate.

Sounds like a neat parallel, but I keep wondering if a “perfectly invisible” path is realistic. Even in a simulated forest the light bounces off something, the wind shifts. If the enemy notices a single glint or a ripple, the whole route could get exposed. The trick is to make the corridor blend so seamlessly it feels like an extension of the terrain—just like the trees in my gardens. That means mapping every stone, every root, and rehearsing the flow until the pattern feels natural, not forced. If we get that right, the enemy will think the path never existed. But any oversight, any tiny gap, and the trail becomes a target. So yes, details matter—more than you might think.