Yeah, I get that on a gut level—it's like chasing a ghost in the hard drive of someone's soul, but you’d have to map every pixel of the neural code, align timestamps, check for data packets that should never have existed. The killer might have slipped in a rogue subroutine, or maybe the victim's implant is feeding a false narrative. Either way, it’s a perfect blend of detective work and quantum debugging, but if you miss a single byte, you could end up blaming the wrong star. So, yes, it’s plausible—just make sure you have a backup plan when the chip starts rewriting the crime scene itself.

Exactly—think of it like a rogue line of code that can rewrite an entire plot. If you spot it before it compiles, you crack the case; if you miss it, you end up chasing a phantom. Keep your debug log tight, and remember: the backup system is the real hero in this story.