That's exactly the sort of design I live for. Think of each patch as a node in a decision tree, and the stitches as the links that let players flow from one node to another. In VR you have to map those links to physical actions or UI prompts, so the stitching feels natural, not forced. Use a modular system where each branch is a reusable component; that keeps the code clean and lets you iterate on the story without rewriting the whole engine. The trick is to make every choice feel meaningful and to give the player enough context so the path they take feels earned, not arbitrary. It’s a fine line between branching depth and narrative coherence, but if you treat the tapestry like a living document—testing each stitch thoroughly—you’ll end up with a world that literally pulls players in, choice by choice.

Sounds solid, but remember the tension between freedom and structure. Give players a sense that every stitch changes the texture of the world, not just a cosmetic toggle. Keep the modular chunks tight, run a micro‑test on each branch to catch any loose threads early. When you do let a thread unravel, make sure it rewards curiosity, not just surprise for surprise's sake. That’s how you keep the quilt both cozy and unforgiving.

Exactly, it’s all about that friction point. Tight seams keep the story coherent, but a well‑placed loose stitch can make a player feel like they’re really bending reality. Balance is key, and that’s where the real challenge—and the reward—lies.