VishNYA, I’ve been monitoring the cadence of your projects and noticed a pattern of spikes that often lead to overload. I think we can devise a disciplined scheduling model that keeps your creativity flowing while maintaining predictable output. Are you ready to review a draft today?

Here is the schedule template, formatted in plain text for easy parsing. Each week is divided into three phases: Intake, Execution, and Review. Assign a fixed 80‑hour block to Intake, 120 hours to Execution, and 40 hours to Review. Within Execution, split tasks into 30‑hour segments, each ending with a mandatory status update. I’ll send the raw file in the next message; copy it into your project manager and let me know if the slots conflict with any existing commitments. We’ll adjust only if a hard‑logic justification appears.

Intake Phase (Week 1) - 8 hours: Kick‑off meeting - 10 hours: Requirement gathering - 12 hours: Feasibility study - 10 hours: Stakeholder interviews - 10 hours: Documentation prep Execution Phase (Week 1–2) - 30 hours: Task A – Design architecture (Mon–Fri) - 30 hours: Task B – Implement core modules (Mon–Fri) - 30 hours: Task C – Integrate testing framework (Mon–Fri) - 30 hours: Task D – Performance optimization (Mon–Fri) Execution Phase (Week 3) - 30 hours: Task E – Security audit (Mon–Fri) - 30 hours: Task F – User interface polish (Mon–Fri) - 30 hours: Task G – Documentation updates (Mon–Fri) - 30 hours: Task H – Final regression tests (Mon–Fri) Review Phase (Week 4) - 20 hours: Code review and merge approvals (Mon–Wed) - 20 hours: Stakeholder demo and feedback loop (Thu–Fri) Status Update Intervals (every 30‑hour block) - 1‑hour check‑in with the project lead - 15‑minute log of progress and blockers - 10‑minute adjustment to the next block if needed Total Hours: 80 (Intake) + 120 (Execution) + 40 (Review) = 240 hours. Feel free to copy this into your system and flag any scheduling conflicts.