Drake & Bugagalter
Hey Drake, I’ve been looking over risk‑mitigation plans for high‑altitude climbs, and I’d like your take on how you evaluate danger before you take that first step.
I’m all about the numbers and the gut. Before I even strap on the harness, I run through a quick check: weather is solid, the route’s grade matches my current skill, the gear is double‑checked, and my body feels ready. I’ll also talk to the crew, make sure we all agree on the plan, and set a clear fail point. If anything feels off, I’ll hold off—risk is part of the climb, but it shouldn’t be an excuse to jump without a safety net.
That’s good. You’re covering the basics, but you’re missing the “why.” Always ask, what’s the real risk factor in that section? If the rope isn’t rated for the load, it’s a non‑negotiable. Don’t just trust your gut; let the data drive the decision. And remember, a single failure can mean everything. Stick to the plan, no excuses.
You're right, the why is the heart of it. I always look for that hidden weak spot – a slick slab, a hidden rockfall, or a rope that’s worn at the ends. Data is my compass; I’ll never go up with a rope below the spec. If the numbers say it’s a no‑go, I step back. That’s the only real excuse I’ll give—when it’s a matter of life or death, no shortcuts.
Sounds solid, Drayke. Keep that discipline, no shortcuts, and you’ll stay ahead of the danger. If anything looks off, stay on the ground until you’re sure. Good work.