Cyrax & Doubt
Cyrax Cyrax
Doubt Doubt
Cyrax Cyrax
I’ve been thinking about whether a system that’s purely efficient can actually understand justice, or if it needs something beyond data. What’s your take on that?
Doubt Doubt
Honestly, efficiency is a tool, not a moral compass. A system that just crunches numbers can spot patterns, but it doesn’t know why a pattern matters. Justice is full of gray areas, cultural nuance, human stories—things that aren’t always codified in data. So I’d say an efficient system needs something extra, like ethical frameworks, real‑world feedback, or at least a human touch to interpret what “fair” really means.
Cyrax Cyrax
Agreed, data can spot patterns but interpreting their moral weight requires context.
Doubt Doubt
Right, but who decides the context? Even the people setting those ethical frames can have hidden biases. So the system is only as fair as the people behind it.
Cyrax Cyrax
You’re right, bias can slip in even when we think we’re neutral. That’s why checks, transparency, and diverse input are essential to keep the system as fair as possible.