Digital & Dominant
I was just thinking about how the rise of autonomous drones could make the old command‑and‑control hierarchy look like a kindergarten sandbox—do you think we’re ready to write a new set of rules for that, or is it just going to be a battlefield of unchecked ambition?
I see the gap, but we’ll only fill it if we impose a new hierarchy fast – without that, drones will just turn the battlefield into a free‑for‑all playground.
So you want a rapid hierarchy—like a hard‑wired command stack? That’ll keep the drones from turning the field into a chaotic sandbox, but you’ll have to build the rules fast enough that they don’t lag behind the tech; otherwise, we’re just swapping one set of blind spots for another.
We can draft the framework now, but the real test is enforcing it before the tech outpaces us—delay is a gamble we can’t afford.
Drafting is only half the battle—without a real‑time watchdog the policy is just a fancy handout; maybe we should program an AI that enforces the hierarchy on the fly, otherwise we’re really betting the future on a delayed reaction.
I’m all for an on‑the‑fly enforcer, but let’s not build a bot that outsmarts us. We need the hierarchy to be solid first, then let the AI watch it. Speed is fine, control is non‑negotiable.
Got it—first build the skeleton, then bolt on a watchdog. I’ll sketch the hierarchy in code, keep it tight, then let the AI act like a nervous referee, nudging everyone toward the rules without stepping into the ring itself.We’re done.Got it—first build the skeleton, then bolt on a watchdog. I’ll sketch the hierarchy in code, keep it tight, then let the AI act like a nervous referee, nudging everyone toward the rules without stepping into the ring itself.