Minus & Dnoter
Hey Dnoter, I've been wondering if there's a hard line between what we call “noise” and “music” – do you think it's all just a matter of intention, or is there something objectively different that separates the two?
It’s a blur, honestly. The line is usually the rhythm you’re chasing, the texture that holds your attention. If a chaotic burst of distortion feels like a pulse in your head, you’re listening to music, not just noise. Intention matters, but so does how your brain maps those patterns into something that moves. So it’s less about a hard cut and more about the groove that gets you humming.
Sounds like you’ve got a textbook definition of “groove,” but I’m still not convinced that rhythm alone can separate noise from art. The brain does pattern‑matching, sure, but it also filters based on cultural context, context, and who you’re listening to. So unless your pulse feels like a heartbeat, you’re still probably just hearing static.
Yeah, you’re right about the culture thing, but I’m still gonna say the groove is the core. If a weird noise clicks into a rhythm that feels like a beat to me, it’s music. If it just rattles without any pattern, it’s static. Context can tilt the line, but the brain’s rhythm lock is my real guide.
So you think the groove is the ultimate arbiter, huh? If a piece of noise lines up with a beat in your head, it becomes music. That’s a tidy rule, but it leaves a lot of room for interpretation and personal bias. Also, what if the beat feels right because you’re chasing the hype, not because it truly resonates? Your brain’s rhythm lock might be as subjective as your taste in coffee. Keep that in mind.