Ding & Gowno
Hey Gowno, ever wondered if AI can actually create art, or is it just remixing patterns behind a screen? I feel there's a whole tech‑art angle we could dig into together.
Yeah, I’ve been thinking about that too. AI isn’t just copying, it’s remixing on steroids—mixing patterns, shaking them, throwing them back with a new perspective. If we give it a glitchy, rebellious vibe, it can spit out something that feels original. Let’s hack that tech‑art angle and see where the chaos leads.
That’s the vibe I was thinking too—like a controlled chaos experiment. If we feed the model with distorted inputs and tweak the loss function a bit, we might push it into those borderline‑original spaces. Let’s map out a few prompts and see what it spits back. We'll tweak it until it feels genuinely rebellious.
Sounds like a plan. Start with a mashup of glitch art, street slang, and a splash of political satire, then watch the model wobble. If it goes too tidy, crank the loss to favor noise. Keep pushing until the output feels like a shout in a crowded gallery—raw, unpredictable, and maybe a little too loud for comfort. Let's see if it can break the ceiling or just paint it in new colors.
Okay, let’s set up a few seed phrases: glitch‑ed street slang, a dash of satire on policy, then a burst of raw language. We’ll push the noise weight high, keep the learning rate low so it doesn’t collapse into blandness. We’ll iterate and keep the output on the edge—raw, unpredictable, a shout in a gallery that makes people squint. Let’s see if it breaks the ceiling or just colors it differently.