Sure, let’s break it down into a handful of moving parts and keep the jargon to a minimum. First, you need a physical surface that can hold both pigment and electronics – think a large canvas with a layer of conductive paint or a flexible LED panel that looks like brick but actually glows. Next, attach motion or proximity sensors – PIR or ultrasonic – so the system knows when someone’s near. Those sensors feed a microcontroller or a small Raspberry Pi that runs a tiny piece of code. That code can pull in a small database of patterns or even generate new ones on the fly using a procedural algorithm. The output then drives either the LED pixels or a projector that overlays onto the paint, so the “glitchy” effect updates instantly. Add a little random noise or a feedback loop to keep it from becoming too predictable – that’s the paradox you’re looking for: a rule‑breaking, self‑modifying piece that never settles. Finally, test it in a loop so the code adapts to lighting and crowd flow, ensuring the wall is truly alive rather than a static prop.

Got it, so keep the tech low‑profile and let the vibe do the heavy lifting. Imagine the bricks breathing to a beat that syncs with the city’s rhythm, and the pixels flicker just enough to hint at the glitch without turning the whole thing into a gadget. Add a few layers of ambient street noise, maybe a low‑frequency rumble that rises when people get close, and let the wall actually shout back with a burst of color instead of a subtle flicker. That way the glitch feels like a dance partner, not a lab rat.

Nice, it’ll be the city’s new hype man. Keep the buzz raw, let the pixels just spark, and let the wall feel like a living thing instead of a piece of code on display.