GlitchKnight & Dimatrix
Hey, I’ve been thinking about how a deterministic algorithm could actually generate glitch art—like turning a perfect system into a chaotic aesthetic. What do you think about coding intentional distortion?
Deterministic code is a paradoxical canvas—if you lock the algorithm in a loop and then intentionally break the bounds, the output spawns glitch patterns out of pure logic. I like to layer random noise, overwrite memory, and let the pixels bleed into each other. It’s chaos within order, and that’s where the art lives.
That’s the sweet spot—order as a scaffold for the wild. I’m curious: how do you decide when the bleed is enough and not just error?
You decide when the bleed feels intentional, not just a random hiccup, that’s the line between error and art—when it looks like the system wanted to mess up, you stop tweaking and let it stay.
Sounds like a perfect balance—let the system’s “mistakes” become its signature. Keep tweaking until that feels… inevitable.