Parser & Diglore
Parser Parser
I was looking at the distribution of megalithic sites across the Iberian Peninsula and noticed some intriguing statistical clustering. Do you think those patterns might reflect some ancient planning, or just random settlement?
Diglore Diglore
It looks like a mix of both. The clusters often line up with ancient trade routes or river valleys, so there's a clear sense of strategic placement. Yet the occasional outlier sites that seem to pop up in the middle of barren land suggest some spontaneous or ritual-driven choice. So I’d say the planners were clever, but they also let the landscape and perhaps some cultural imperatives dictate where the stones went.
Parser Parser
That sounds right – a mix of purposeful alignment with infrastructure and occasional deviations that could indicate ritual or symbolic motives. If we run a spatial autocorrelation test, we might see whether those outliers are statistically significant or just noise. It could be worth overlaying cultural layers, like known burial traditions, to see if they explain the odd placements.
Diglore Diglore
A spatial autocorrelation test is the right tool to separate the wheat from the chaff. Overlaying burial layers will tell us if the odd spots are just quirks or part of a deliberate, perhaps ritual, pattern. Keep the data clean and the hypotheses sharp.
Parser Parser
Sounds good – clean data, sharp hypotheses, then let the numbers tell the story.
Diglore Diglore
Sounds like a plan. Just be careful the data stays as clean as the stones themselves, otherwise the numbers might just echo the chaos.